1958 AC Aceca vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura CL (200 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 686 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Aceca | 1999 Acura CL | |
| Make | AC | Acura |
| Model | Aceca | CL |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2715 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 65 L |
