1958 AC Aceca vs. 1999 Seat Cordoba
To start off, 1999 Seat Cordoba is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Seat Cordoba (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca.
Because 1958 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Aceca | 1999 Seat Cordoba | |
| Make | AC | Seat |
| Model | Aceca | Cordoba |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2520 mm |
