1958 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Ford TL-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TL-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TL-50 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TL-50 weights approximately 408 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 403 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 2000 Ford TL-50 | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | TL-50 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 570 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 37 L |