1958 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Audi Steppenwolf
To start off, 2001 Audi Steppenwolf is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Audi Steppenwolf is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi Steppenwolf (220 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi Steppenwolf should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi Steppenwolf weights approximately 10 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Audi Steppenwolf is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi Steppenwolf will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 2001 Audi Steppenwolf | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | Steppenwolf |
Year Released | 1958 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |