1958 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,969 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (301 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Aceca | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | AC | Jeep |
| Model | Aceca | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3969 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 301 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2380 mm |
