1958 AC Aceca vs. 2002 Bugatti EB 218
To start off, 2002 Bugatti EB 218 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,255 cc (18 cylinders), 2002 Bugatti EB 218 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bugatti EB 218 (544 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 470 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bugatti EB 218 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Bugatti EB 218 weights approximately 1280 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Bugatti EB 218 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Bugatti EB 218 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 2002 Bugatti EB 218 | |
Make | AC | Bugatti |
Model | Aceca | EB 218 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6255 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 18 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 544 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3340 mm |