1958 AC Aceca vs. 2002 Isuzu D-MAX
To start off, 2002 Isuzu D-MAX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Isuzu D-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Isuzu D-MAX (129 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Isuzu D-MAX should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Isuzu D-MAX weights approximately 955 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Isuzu D-MAX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Isuzu D-MAX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 2002 Isuzu D-MAX | |
Make | AC | Isuzu |
Model | Aceca | D-MAX |
Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3060 mm |