1958 AC Aceca vs. 2003 Caterham 7
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 AC Aceca weights approximately 390 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 2003 Caterham 7 | |
Make | AC | Caterham |
Model | Aceca | 7 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2230 mm |