1958 AC Aceca vs. 2003 Chrysler Airflite
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Airflite is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Airflite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Airflite should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Airflite weights approximately 706 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (341 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2003 Chrysler Airflite will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 2003 Chrysler Airflite | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Aceca | Airflite |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 253 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 341 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 100 L |