1958 AC Aceca vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 391 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Aceca | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |