1958 AC Aceca vs. 2011 Ford F-150
To start off, 2011 Ford F-150 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-150 (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1489 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 2011 Ford F-150 | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | F-150 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2379 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2012 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 98 L |