1958 AC Aceca vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 902 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Aceca | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1792 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3881 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1826 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2423 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |