1958 AC Aceca vs. 2011 Volvo S60
To start off, 2011 Volvo S60 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo S60 (180 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo S60 weights approximately 719 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 2011 Volvo S60 | |
Make | AC | Volvo |
Model | Aceca | S60 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 180 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 67 L |