1958 AC Aceca vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 550 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Aceca | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | AC | Lotus |
| Model | Aceca | Evora |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4361 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2575 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |
