1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 vs. 1951 Allard K2
To start off, 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 (106 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 weights approximately 142 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 | 1951 Allard K2 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
Model | 2000 | K2 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 3622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1337 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |