1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 vs. 1953 Chevrolet Corvette
To start off, 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 3,859 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Chevrolet Corvette (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. (106 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 weights approximately 44 kg more than 1953 Chevrolet Corvette.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 | 1953 Chevrolet Corvette | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 2000 | Corvette |
Year Released | 1958 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 3859 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 90.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1337 kg | 1293 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 60 L |