1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 vs. 1968 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1968 Cadillac Calais is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. (106 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 768 kg more than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 559 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. (152 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 | 1968 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 2000 | Calais |
Year Released | 1958 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 711 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 109.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 103.1 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1337 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 82 L |