1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 vs. 1983 Toyota Celica

To start off, 1983 Toyota Celica is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Toyota Celica (115 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. (106 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 weights approximately 172 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Toyota Celica (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. (152 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1983 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. 1983 Toyota Celica has automatic transmission and 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 has manual transmission. 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Toyota Celica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 1983 Toyota Celica
Make Alfa Romeo Toyota
Model 2000 Celica
Year Released 1958 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1975 cc 1988 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 106 HP 115 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 152 Nm 172 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84.5 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 75 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 8.8:1
Top Speed 161 km/hour 180 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1337 kg 1165 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4630 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 71 L 61 L