1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III
To start off, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alpine A 106 | 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | |
Make | Alpine | Austin-Healey |
Model | A 106 | 3000 Mk III |
Year Released | 1958 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 54 L |