1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 1972 Austin 2200
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alpine A 106 | 1972 Austin 2200 | |
Make | Alpine | Austin |
Model | A 106 | 2200 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 2227 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 56 L |