1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne
To start off, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alpine A 106 | 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A 106 | Biscayne |
Year Released | 1958 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 4097 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 87 L |