1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 1980 Austin Allegro
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Allegro (59 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Allegro weights approximately 295 kg more than 1958 Alpine A 106. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alpine A 106 | 1980 Austin Allegro | |
Make | Alpine | Austin |
Model | A 106 | Allegro |
Year Released | 1958 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 555 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2450 mm |