1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 1980 Autobianchi A 112
To start off, 1980 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 965 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Autobianchi A 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Autobianchi A 112 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Because 1958 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alpine A 106 | 1980 Autobianchi A 112 | |
Make | Alpine | Autobianchi |
Model | A 106 | A 112 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1980 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 30 L |