1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 1989 Fiat Croma
To start off, 1989 Fiat Croma is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Fiat Croma (116 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Because 1958 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alpine A 106 | 1989 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Alpine | Fiat |
Model | A 106 | Croma |
Year Released | 1958 | 1989 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 68 L |