1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 2000 Chevrolet S-10
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 (119 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Because 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet S-10 has automatic transmission and 1958 Alpine A 106 has manual transmission. 1958 Alpine A 106 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet S-10 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alpine A 106 | 2000 Chevrolet S-10 | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A 106 | S-10 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3130 mm |