1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 2004 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 5,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 308 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alpine A 106 | 2004 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
Model | A 106 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 5996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 117 L |