1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 904 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Alpine A 106 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alpine A 106 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Alpine | MCC |
Model | A 106 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 1810 mm |