1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alpine A 106 | 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A 106 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 4162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 95 L |