1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Alpine A 106. (57 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alpine A 106 | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Alpine | Jeep |
Model | A 106 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 72 L |