1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alpine A 106 | 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Alpine | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A 106 | ML |
Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 83 L |