1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 2006 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (147 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alpine A 106 | 2006 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Alpine | Jeep |
Model | A 106 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 2425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 72 L |