1958 Alpine A 106 vs. 2010 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Because 1958 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Alpine A 106 | 2010 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | Alpine | Volkswagen |
| Model | A 106 | Eos |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 904 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4409 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1791 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1443 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2578 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 55 L |
