1958 Alvis TC 108 G vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alvis TC 108 G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alvis TC 108 G would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Alvis TC 108 G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rover 75 (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1958 Alvis TC 108 G. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1958 Alvis TC 108 G.
Because 1958 Alvis TC 108 G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Alvis TC 108 G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Alvis TC 108 G (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1958 Alvis TC 108 G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alvis TC 108 G | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Alvis | Rover |
Model | TC 108 G | 75 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1796 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1415 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |