1958 Alvis TC 108 G vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alvis TC 108 G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alvis TC 108 G would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Alvis TC 108 G weights approximately 150 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 1958 Alvis TC 108 G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Alvis TC 108 G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Alvis TC 108 G (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1958 Alvis TC 108 G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alvis TC 108 G | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Alvis | Mini |
Model | TC 108 G | Cooper |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |