1958 Alvis TD vs. 2000 Chrysler Neon
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alvis TD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alvis TD would be higher. At 2,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Alvis TD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Alvis TD (116 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (113 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Alvis TD should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Alvis TD weights approximately 255 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Alvis TD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Alvis TD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Alvis TD (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (157 Nm @ 4550 RPM). This means 1958 Alvis TD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alvis TD | 2000 Chrysler Neon | |
Make | Alvis | Chrysler |
Model | TD | Neon |
Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2991 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4550 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 85.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 47 L |