1958 Alvis TD vs. 2000 Dodge Dakota

To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alvis TD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alvis TD would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Alvis TD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Alvis TD. (221 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Alvis TD.

Compare all specifications:

1958 Alvis TD 2000 Dodge Dakota
Make Alvis Dodge
Model TD Dakota
Year Released 1958 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2991 cc 4699 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 116 HP 0 HP
Torque 221 Nm 576 Nm
Top Speed 169 km/hour 249 km/hour
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 3 seats
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4980 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1670 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2850 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]