1958 Alvis TD vs. 2002 Holden HSV
To start off, 2002 Holden HSV is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alvis TD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alvis TD would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 471 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Alvis TD. (221 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Alvis TD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Alvis TD | 2002 Holden HSV | |
| Make | Alvis | Holden |
| Model | TD | HSV |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2991 cc | 5698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 692 Nm |
| Top Speed | 169 km/hour | 263 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
