1958 Alvis TD vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alvis TD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alvis TD would be higher. At 2,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Alvis TD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Alvis TD (116 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Alvis TD should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Alvis TD weights approximately 681 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Alvis TD (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1958 Alvis TD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alvis TD | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Alvis | MCC |
Model | TD | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 2991 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 1810 mm |