1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 1983 Fiat Panda
To start off, 1983 Fiat Panda is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 2,290 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire weights approximately 960 kg more than 1983 Fiat Panda.
Because 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire | 1983 Fiat Panda | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Fiat |
| Model | Sapphire | Panda |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2290 cc | 843 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2170 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 40 L |
