1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 70 kg more than 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire.
Because 2002 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire has manual transmission. 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Toyota |
Model | Sapphire | Tundra |
Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2290 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3270 mm |