1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire. (145 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire weights approximately 638 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Sunbeam |
| Model | Star Sapphire | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 3990 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1778 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 27 L |
