1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire would be higher. At 7,446 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 2 kg more than 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Oldsmobile |
Model | Star Sapphire | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1958 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3990 cc | 7446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1778 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2960 mm |