1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire would be higher. At 3,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire. (312 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Holden |
Model | Star Sapphire | Colorado |
Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3990 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 313 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |