1958 Aston Martin DB4 vs. 2000 Holden GTS-R
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Aston Martin DB4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Aston Martin DB4 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1958 Aston Martin DB4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Aston Martin DB4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Aston Martin DB4. (360 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Aston Martin DB4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Aston Martin DB4 | 2000 Holden GTS-R | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Holden |
| Model | DB4 | GTS-R |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3670 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 257 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 644 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
