1958 Austin A 35 vs. 1942 Cadillac 61
To start off, 1958 Austin A 35 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,274 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 61 (123 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 61 should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1958 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 35 | 1942 Cadillac 61 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 35 | 61 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 5274 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1900 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3280 mm |