1958 Austin A 35 vs. 1952 Austin A 40
To start off, 1958 Austin A 35 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A 40 (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 282 kg more than 1958 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin A 40 (80 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1952 Austin A 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin A 35 | 1952 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Austin | Austin |
| Model | A 35 | A 40 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 65.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 89 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 972 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 48 L |
