1958 Austin A 35 vs. 1972 Rover 2000
To start off, 1972 Rover 2000 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Rover 2000 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover 2000 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1958 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover 2000 (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1972 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin A 35 | 1972 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Austin | Rover |
| Model | A 35 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2640 mm |
