1958 Austin A 35 vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (187 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 702 kg more than 1958 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 35 | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 35 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 3801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1392 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 45 L |