1958 Austin A 35 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS weights approximately 1215 kg more than 1958 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS (270 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Austin A 35 | 2000 Mitsubishi SSS | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A 35 | SSS |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 162 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 71 L |
