1958 Austin A 35 vs. 2000 Volvo S40
To start off, 2000 Volvo S40 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 1,948 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S40 (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S40 weights approximately 640 kg more than 1958 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S40 (298 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2000 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 35 | 2000 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | A 35 | S40 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 83.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 89.9 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 58 L |